The Lombard Review

Anniversary: Our first year, graded

Calls vs realised curve

The north face of the Eccles Building, Washington
The north face of the Eccles Building, Washington Photo: AgnosticPreachersKid/Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 3.0

Key dataFFR 5.25–5.50% vs 2.25–2.50%

One year ago, this column commenced with a simple premise: that the most aggressive central bank tightening cycle in forty years would inevitably collide with private balance sheets. Twelve months later, the federal funds rate sits between 5.25 and 5.50 per cent, compared to 2.25 to 2.50 per cent when we began. The market consensus that anticipated an immediate recession and early rate cuts has been utterly confounded by economic resilience.

Underground gold mine tour, Gold Reef City, Johannesburg, South Africa
Underground gold mine tour, Gold Reef City, Johannesburg, South Africa Photo: Ossewa/Wikimedia Commons · CC BY 4.0

The Realised Path

Yet defying recession is not synonymous with escaping consequences. Over the past twelve months, the yield curve has inverted violently, three major regional banks have collapsed into receivership, and the cost of sovereign debt service has doubled. The financial system has absorbed the initial rate shock through legacy cash buffers and fixed-rate hedges; the true test begins as those protections expire.

Connaught Place, B Block at night, Delhi
Connaught Place, B Block at night, Delhi Photo: Slyronit/Wikimedia Commons · CC BY-SA 4.0

A year of hyper-tightening has demonstrated the surprising resilience of private balance sheets, but it has merely delayed the refinancing reckoning rather than averted it.

Write to The Lombard Review at contact@thelombardreview.com

More From The Lombard Review